Group Think Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Group Thinking Essays

Group ThinkThis type of dysfunctional act of an system has many ways and opportunities for trouble. The basic fundamentals of this process be the beginnings of failure as conclaves seek conformity and unity they sacrifice everything in regularise to maintain peace within the group. Many times this will borrow the various(prenominal)s creative thoughts and ability to voice the creative edge thinking away. In many organizations this is a process that is continually employ. It is perceived that management wants the organizations operation or process to run without any type of question or waves. Below are listed eight of the main symptoms of group think as detailed by Janis, I. L & Manns book Decision makingSymptoms of Groupthink are divided into three types in which they can manifest themselves Type I Overestimations of the groups power and moralityType II Closed-mindednessType III pressure toward uniformityWhen scattered down the three types of groupthink can be broken fart her down toeight ways groupthink causes failure.1.Illusion of invulnerability Members push aside obvious danger, take extreme risks, and are overly optimistic.2.Collective systematization Members discredit and explain away warnings contrary to group thinking.3.Illusions of Morality Members expect back that their finalitys are morally correct ignoring the ethical consequences of their decisions.4.Excessive Stereotyping The group constructs controvert stereotypes of rivals outside the group.5.Pressure for Conformity Members pressure any in a group who expresses arguments against the groups stereotypes, illusions, or commitment, viewing such opposition and disloyalty.6.Self-censorship Members withhold their disagree views and counter arguments.7.Illusion of Unanimity Members perceive falsely that everyone agrees with the group decision silence is seen as consent. 8.Mindguards Some members appoint themselves to the role of protecting the group from adverse information that might threaten group compliance.Personal styles are limited by the group with GROUP THINK. Most of the time the individual will not take the chance to buck the system or willing to take the chance of being discredited by the center group if they do not agree with the process and or forethought that is being lead.Decision styles are affe... ...ve that the label of Groupthink can be used similarly loosely. I myself have experienced situations where a Group is too quick to label themselves as sufferers of Groupthink. Although I truly think that Groupthink is a severe problem that exists today, the Challenger being one of the most unfortunate of those examples. I believe that we all need to be careful not to be too swift about the use of the Groupthink label. It can be just as negative to a group to label them as wronged in their process when no such error exists as to call them victims of Groupthink. Again the dilemma is that groups need to always be alert to the humanity of Groupthink , they also need to not label themselves or other victims of Groupthink unfairly. Although in that respect are many times that Groupthink leads to failure, there are few instances when it plant for the food. This is a fine line to walk, but it is most definitely a line that needs to be walked time and time again. Works CitedJarvis, Chris. GROUPTHINKJanis, Irving L. Victims Of Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin beau monde Boston, 1972Janis, Irving L. Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, 1982Griffin, Em. Groupthink. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1997