Human Population and Population Growth

In early years human universe of discourse and creation increase has non been an issue. This is because of the variety of distinct environmental divisors. Sickness and disease has vie a large role in keeping human population nether go out since the beginning of time. It seemed that when a population would get everywhere crowded an epidemic such as, the influenza or sm exclusively syphilis would break out. This would drastically decrease the population enough that it would be under(a) control again. Famine is a nonher great controller of population.When a dearth strikes an area provided the few with enough food will be able to reproduce or even survive. An examination of ball population control would not be complete with out including war. War excessively performs wonders at controlling population by murdering most men of sister rearing age. In straightaways day and age, with our current applied science increases disease outbreak and famine (except in some 3rd world countries) is not much of a factor any to a greater extent. War is not considered a valid population control method due to todays new wars.Without the three largest population controllers much of a factor any more, population is free to run out of control. This provides us with an ever-increasing bitterness this is whether g all overning body or guild should dictate family size. I believe that society can infringe indirect controls over family size, but these are considered more community norms as opposed to hard fast rules such as giving medications can set. Two examples will follow. First, we will look at our society. Yes, the ground forcess turn to no child and one-child families. This was caused by society.Society weighes Americans to adopt successful careers both male and female. There has been a switch from families to careers. This does not providing Americans with the time or office for multiple children, but cutting the amount down to one or none. Another example of societys control is the push in some Asian/Middle Eastern countries for a familys first child to be male. Even when there is no regime regulation many another(prenominal) cultures push for your first child to be male. This forces families to end females and even murder them at one time they have been innate(p).Once again this is a society/cultural push not a mandated rule. These instances are what different societies have created for themselves, when included in one of these societies it is hard to say whether it is sound or wrong. I will first address the aspect that presidency should not control family size. First of all, it is a natural and religious adept to produce offspring. Breed, multiply and populate has been the belief since the beginning of time. The idea is to fix population so that our beliefs and way of life may be hand out and passed on.Who is government to take these right wing away? Governmental control over family size goes against everything that the U SA stands for. This would be an age-old idea called freedom. When a government starts dictating the kind and size of family a person can have. Almost all freedom is lost. Another topic briefly addressed above is the aborting and murdering of babies that arent male. A first hand example of this is China. China regulates or gives incentives to families that only produce one child. This is where the problem begins because most families want this child to be male.Male children are providers and will go out and join the workings world. They will be successful. Many female babies are aborted once sex is determined. If sex is not determined before birth, once born many female babies are abandoned or destroyed. This showing the cruelness that government controlled family size will push people to. Government should control family size because in most instances the general population cannot handle this for themselves. A prime example of this is our already over crowded inner cities. deal w ith chemical addictions and no financial means are cranking out babies right and left.They have no means of providing for all of these children. Government currently provides for these under privileged children, that as cruel as it sounds, should not have been born. I have had a first hand example of this problem. A family paladin in another state has adopted three crack babies from the very(prenominal) mother this mother is also on welfare. This certain mother is by no means an exception. China is another example of why government needs to control population. Look at the current problems that they are face with because in previous years they have done nothing.Left uncontrolled, population will snowball out of control. Government needs to be certain of the ever -increasing population growth problem. I believe that rather that mandating how many children a family can have. They should educate its population on different means of birth control and possibly start providing for free . Especially in this soil a harsher penalties needs to be oblige for chemical dependent mothers that proceed baby factories. An education/management plan can be imposed allowing individuals the freedom to determine the number of children they desire to have.