Marxist Theory and Sport Essay -- essays research papers

This essay willing be an attempt to lead together the ideas from our class readings about the bolshy sociological perspective as wellspring as insight from other readings to further my considering of Marxism and its applications to swash. I will lay the groundwork for the theory then proceed with how his theory is applied to accessibility issues in pleasure, distribution of power in sport and commercialization of sport.Basics of Marxist TheoryThe most widely apply political and ideologic system of thought is that of Karl Marx. Marxism is a set of ideas hard to provide an explanation for human gild. Although a little over a hundred years old his theories and thoughts energize led to coups, revolutions and new waves theories and academics. As well, it is this systemic theory that has led many academics to look at the guidance they teach, discuss, write and change surface look at the way the world acts and thinks, even within their own small worlds. Within the world of sp ort the ideological views have no real place however it is possible to check the views of Marx to the idea of sport. Marxism is known as the interpretation of the thoughts of Karl Marx (1813 - 1883), a German loving theorist and political revolutionary. Karl Marx wanted to understand the politics, culture and economics of the pertly emerging nations within Europe. He emphasized the leading role of the delivery in society as a whole as well as in societal parts, known as superstructures. These superstructures are non-economic aspects of society, i.e. culture, religion, accessible life, education, religion, politics and social institutions. Marx identified society as consisting of two classes The supposed Bourgeoisie and the so-called Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie is a capitalistic, wealthy and powerful minority consisting of aristocracy and upper class members meanwhile the Proletariat, also known as working-class, holds the majority of societal members who are poor, semi- or u nskilled workers. The Bourgeoisie owns the entire means of production and wealth, therefore they are powerful and hegemonic. Their hegemony is maintained because except they have access to the financial and productive means. Their ideologies, i.e. their thoughts and beliefs, are hegemonic and influencing as they have the power to establish them in society (Rigauer, 2000).In contrast, the Proletariat is change from and by the Bourgeoisie. Th... ... of sport in our society still cannot be ignored. Thus, large(p) his theory partial credibility in my opinion. While I struggled to understand how this information could be used directly in the field of sport administration, in the end, I have learned that simply being mindful of different sociological theories can help to understand why society behaves the way it does in the sport context. This application is very indirect however, it will allow me to approach future situations with a deeper understanding of sports in society.Referenc esRigauer, B. (2000). Marxist Theories. In J, Coakley and E. Dunning (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Studies (pp. 28-47). Thousand Oaks, CA SageGiddens, A. (2001) Sociology fourth ed. Cambridge. Polity Press. Haralambos, M. and Holborn, M. (2000) Sociology Themes and Perspectives 5th ed. London. HarperCollins Publishers Limited.Abercrombie, N. et al (2000) The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology 4th ed. London. Penguin Books.Manthorp, N. (2003) Guardian numberless Network. Feature Article. Accessed Online. Available http//sport.guardian.co.uk/cricket/story/0,10069,870038,00.htmlSafai, P. (2005). Lecture Notes - APA 5304. January 18, 2005.