A Case for Open Borders Essay -- Human Right Argumentative Persuasive

A Case for equal to(p) Borders In his address to a joint session of Congress on January 8, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson declared freedom of the seas in times of peace and war. expression back, it seems ridiculous to think that anyone could challenge the reform of individuals to navigate the oceans freely. However, fast-forward to the twenty-first coulomb and we can see an analogous debate over the issue of immigration beneficials, with territorial borders creation the main topic of discussion. The system of immigration in the United States is complex and oftentimes repressive, and while revisions to the system usually overwhelm increasing quotas or other solutions to let in certain groups of slew who deserve special consideration (such as those whose skills are needed in a particular field), they are still really limited solutions. The clear question that arises from letting in some people but non others is that of fairness. Is the accident of birth or luck of being in the proficient place at the right time enough to justify restrictive citizenship to a select few? I would argue not. I denominate to argue that a commitment to valet rights entails the go under that borders ought to be able in order to guarantee other humankind rights, especially the right to migrate.In order to understand why a commitment to human rights includes a commitment to open borders, we must understand why the right to migrate is a human right. This can be proven with a simple logical syllogism. We must first assume that all individuals defend equal raw(a) rights in the state of natural law, or the very primitive sense of man before government was formed. Locke defines the state of natural law as a state of equality all the violence and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one h... ...of his statement, however, Walzer is claiming that fulfilling this urgent need (or right) should only be done if it is convenient to the other party. This is a contradiction to human rights, as they should be inherent and not granted but demanded without embarrassment or shame . Indeed, restricting borders is the act of convenience and if it is done for reasons other than emergencies (such as possible spread of infectious diseases) is a violation of a human beings right to migrate. Giving rights to citizens for the sole reason of being citizens and denying citizenship to some effectively denies rights to that group. Human rights belong to individuals, not citizens. Humanity has confront so many obstacles to human rights that it will surely transcend lines on maps, because we are committed to human rights and this entails a commitment to a position of open borders.