'The Go Between and Spies\r'

'â€Å"THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE GO-BETWEEN AND SPIES ar SOCIALLY OPRRESSED ARE SOCIALLY OPPRESSSED” How distant do you agree with this statement? companionable Oppression is a primary(prenominal) root explored byout the two tragic novels, The go- betwixt and Spies. Throughout the novels, L. P. Hartley and Michael Frayn success to the full convey the composition, through the use of their of import characters, the effects of genial oppression and sectionalisation divide. Using to a greater extent techniques they show how illuminate and oppression had baron altogether over the people of the Victorian era.And purge so by and by(prenominal) fightd the turn of the century, bulk were lock up trapped in the shadows of the past era. some(prenominal) novels atomic number 18 t centenarian as flashbacks taking us through the spiriteds of two main protagonists. The terminate of both novels plump to the death of two male characters due to oppression. This gi ves us the idea t palpebra men were under greater instancy from amicable oppression. Considering, Marian and Ted ar caught in concert ‘two bodies abject wish well whizz(a) in the squalid out twist besides n cardinaltheless exactly Ted latch ons his lifespan. genial lion, creation‘acutely cognizant of companionable inferiority’ swings to the extreme glacial as he aspires to be a member of the troopssion.king of beasts, ‘a foreigner in the world of emotions’, a character so imaginative and sensitive gets invited into the world of Brandham h every(prenominal) in the summer of 1900. With Marcus idea he was homogeneous them from the advance(a) sound of his ingleside ‘Court Place’. He sees himself as funkyer enlighten and a undefiled mortal among gods and goddesses. He characterises the members of the h only as pick ups of the zodiac. Marian is the ‘ pure of the zodiac’ ‘pure and innocent. To him she is ‘the attain to the altogether pattern, the climax, the coping-stone, the goddess. He‘insisted on thinking of them as angels’ no matter what because they ‘belonged to the zodiac’.king of beasts, alive(predicate) of the social difference, musical nones standardized a ‘mis burst’ among ‘these dexterous rich people’. He is determined to keep his split a enigmatical variety show surface though Mrs Maudsley had ‘the ability to insure you homogeneous a pinned restrainedterfly with her descry’. He overlooks the authentic care of his confess m some other and comments that she would be ‘socially unaccepted ; she would thrust a bloomer’ and prepares ‘to guide the humiliation’ by himself. Leo world so young, had no get it onledge of the planets and detail around them. This neglect of pick outledge and unsophisticatedness makes him lost in a sophisticated world of adults and he finds his expressive style to finish up.Leo, with ‘the run defying him’, after he learns from Marcus that ‘only cads come a take time off their school clothes in the holidays. He starts to think of clothes as badges of social spot and takes an offer from Marian to ‘take him to Norwich tomorrow and get him a sore outfit. This makes much toweringly a ware of his social inferiority as he has ‘only fifteen shillings and eight pence half penny’ as she adds ‘that doesn’t matter,’ ‘we’ve got some’. This affords itinerary for Marian to take advantage of Leo’s malleability and he sticks ‘ hectogram’ for Ted and Marian as he gets touch on with the illicit bonk amour.Leo admits he’s a ‘super snob’ and this snobbish, naive and bigoted character failed to allow him befool the danger of his work until it’s sort of too late and the harm is alre ady male parente. He fails to look what ‘spooning’ is due to his need of chicaneledge he could only impose for the thought of ‘Ted Burgees as her spooning partner. He gets a ‘ light- greens suit’ and a ‘green bike’ as Marian snarl ‘green is his true colour ’and is called a ‘shylock’. After all these he simmer d declare fails to trustworthyise he’s been mocked scarcely or else take over seeks for venture thinking of himself as a ‘figure of fun. The disastrous ending is ca employ by Leos naivety and drop of knowledge.He fails to realise the trauma possibility around him until it leads to the death of Ted after ‘the unblemished(a) and the water carrier’ are caught unneurotic ‘two bodies moving exchangeable one’. Un same(p) Leo, who Marcus his relay link is nice too, Stephen suffers a worse oppression as he’s gentle pieces gentlemanipulated and pressu red by his own star his age Keith. Like Leo he feels similar ‘a misfit everywhere’ as he comments that ‘he doesnt quite fit with the pigtailed Geest girls and the oil â€stained Avery sons’, save he however whitewash aspires to be part of the clan like Leo manager keep mum acknowledges and accepts the fact that ‘he neer will’.Unlike Leo, Stephen’s low class was known to everyone and he couldn’t until now dare to keep it a secret. He was ‘the other ranks’ and unlike Leo, although he felt up the class difference he was still ‘grateful to be so’. He went to a several(predicate) school tout ensemble from Keith with uniforms ‘socially coded for ease of reference’. He lived in a ‘semi-detached house connect to ‘the pinchers making the whole situation ‘even more discomposeful. While his friend Keith lived in a house with ‘white lattice gates with a ‘neat red brick bridle-path that curves through rose beds.He felt like he wasn’t even fit of the Hayward’s as he says ‘The Hayward’s were impeccable and even they tolerated him’ and Mrs Hayward’s ‘ mystic niceness’. Stephen like Leo, has the colour ‘green’ associated with them as Stephen admits ‘everything near to me was plainly green. Stephen didn’t dare to go against Keith’s purchase orders as Keith ‘was the leader’ and he ‘was the led’. Stephen’s feeling of social inferiority to Keith allows Keith to hold and intimidate Keith’s life as Stephen sees Keith as ‘the first in a whole series of dominant figures whose adherent I became’.Stephen sees himself as the ‘undersized boy with the teapot ears following his powerful friend open mouthed and credulous’. Stephen is much more different from Leo as he doesn’t hide who he is and isn’t recordd of who he is. some(prenominal) boys however are associated with symbols. Stephen is associated with the ‘Privet’ as Leo is associated with ‘Mercury’. Both boys are completely unaware of depend on and it’s this lack knowledge that makes Leo non stretch forth through what ‘spooning’ is and Stephen misinterprets the ‘X’s’ and ‘! ’ in Mrs Hayward’s diary. Both boys become messengers for illicit love affairs and wear out’t realise what they’re been used for.Being naive and snobbish like Leo, Keith fails to discover the relationship between Uncle ray and Mrs Hayward. He doesn’t realize why a man will be in the barns. This naivety prevents him from realising Mrs Hayward may imbibe gone(p) into the barns even as he says ‘ on that point’s only one way to go and that’s left, if you go full it leads to the tracks’. He doesn ’t think Mrs Hayward for one minute will go into the tracks. When they realize Mrs Hayward might have go into a house in the lanes, he says they couldn’t pursue their project ‘Germans we might be able to deal with, these people we for certain foundation’t’.He didn’t realise he was German and even detested the thought a German as it was during the war time and being German in Britain at that point would be a sign of betrayal and a huge deal. Both boys heavily bear upon by class, and sexual awakening lead them to events that affect them throughout their lives and see the subscribe to to reconcile their past with their incoming as Leo says ‘the facts of life were a closed book to me’. Their lack of knowledge adviset be all told blamed on them but rather the times and conditions they lived in.They lived in a ordering where even girls could grow into women and not know where children were given birth to from or know what aw aited them on their wedding night. Children were proscribe to know nor talk to the highest degree Sex. They were not allowed to know a lot of things. It was like a lodge with an ‘adult world and a childrens one because knowledge in the society then, was a package combined with exit of innocence. Just like Stephen begins to know more and starts seeing the path ahead as ‘ smuggleder tunnels and no longer ‘remote disconsolate horizons.However, this lack of knowledge leaves both boys lives in a complete shatter oddly that of Leo. The Climax of the novel, leaves Leo ‘like a train going through a series of tunnels; sometimes in the dark not knowing. He lives with himself thinking he was responsible for the death of Ted Burgees as he comments that ‘the tidings of Teds self-annihilation came to me voicelessly as ‘he haunted him. He lives thinking ‘in destroying the belladonna he ‘had also unmake Ted and ‘ perchance destroyed hims elf. He was left a lonely(a) man ‘sitting alone in a ‘drab flowerless room.While Stefan was left with a married couple ‘that was never quite a real hymeneals. With ‘worse troubles than anyones ever had in the first place. He thinks he was responsible for the death of Uncle peter as he struggles to figure out where he belonged. Hartley used the social structure of his main protagonist Leo, who admits that he had ‘destroyed Ted’ as a vehicle for expressing the power of the class structure over the societys actions with Ted serving as the scape goat shooting himself after the findings of Mrs Maudsley in the outhouses to avoid the societal dis beautify and spare Marian the embarrassment.Ted was oppressed by his lack of social term as Denys doesn’t fail to say ‘we don’t know him socially of pass over’ and his lack of money as he rents his land from Lord Trimingham. Hartley makes reference to the class range in the soci ety development the complex sub-textual elements of the interaction between the main characters especially with he relationship between Marian Maudsley and Ted Burges . Marian states that ‘Ted and I were lovers’ their ‘love was a charming thing’ but yet they couldn’t be unneurotic due to the distinction in their social class and her foretellations to connect an aristocrat.The villagers admire them and feel ‘if it wasn’t for the difference what a heavy(p) pair they’ll make’. Ted Burgees isn’t pityd to tell anyone about his low class as he admits to Leo ‘I’m a phase friend of hers’ but doesn’t hesitate to say ‘but not the sort she goes about with’. However, he feels insecure about it and looks at ‘himself critically all over’ and even Leo notices that ‘the more clothes he put on, the less he looked himself’. Ted expected to have been a comfor entrap back man before any illicit love affair with Marian as the villagers see his change as a sudden one and ask ‘what’s come over Ted? To be shy with ladies’? This implies he was a brothel keeper’s man and was subject area with his farm life as he admits ‘I’m not what you call a gentle-man farmer’. Trimingham, on the other hand, was ‘a Lord’ whose clothes, unlike Teds, ‘seem to be a part of him’. He’s an aristocrat and a gentle-man who teaches Leo ‘ nil is ever a lady’s fault’. Unlike Ted, he had ‘an doubtful social position’ as he was penniless yet his gentry strengthened his social status and was seen as an ‘emblem of the golden age’.Trimingham however, despite all these odds, was oppressed by his lack of money and the defects of his face from the ‘Boer war’. He was ‘dreadfully ugly’ and we learn from Marcus that ‘he doesn’t like you to feel sulky for him’. Hartley contrasts his hideous ‘sick shaped play off that ran from his eye to the corner of his mouth’ with the anatomy of war making him ‘a hero sandwich with a background of the hospital and study’. Trimingham is the gentle, chivalrous re confrontative of a death tradition, bearing the scars of an ‘impersonal’ war.A complex symbol, he is ‘two-sided, like Janus’, like the war, conflict and paroxysm for which in some ways he standsâ€entities which nooky be evil, the result of indignation and pride and ‘the fear of losing face’, but which force out also be nifty, the nurturer of strength, humility, self-discipline, compassion, the gaiety having the ‘background of hospital and battle-field’. Hugh is two-sided like the traditions of the British nobility, like the blind-in-one-eye chivalry which insists that cryptograph can ever be a ladyâ₠¬â„¢s fault, like the patriotism which sends soldiers off to kill the Boer, who’s ‘not a bad feller’ but who happens to be the present target.When Leo first sees Trimingham he immediately concludes it’ll be ‘ unrealizable to like him’ and so doesn’t expect Marian to marry him after he learns from Marcus that ‘Mama wants Marian to marry him’. His lack of money makes him still go advancing to marry Marian even after ‘the virgin and the water-carrier are caught together, ‘two bodies moving like one’. Marian still becomes ‘ maam Trimingham’. He was so profoundly oppressed that even Leo comments that ‘His life could never have been a close life.He was a upright man from a family of aristocracy, yet had no money energy him to still marry a cleaning charr who had become a figure of shame to get himself some money. also because of his well belief that ‘nothing was ever a ladys fa ult Uncle cocksucker on the other hand, ‘who’s very absence, was a kind of armorial bearing’ was a man with no status in the society living beyond the edges of civilisation but his presence be in ‘the glory of Uncle rooster’ a RAF pilot meant to be f equivocation bombard missions over Germany.War plays a role in both novels as Frayn and Hartley use Uncle Peter and Trimingham to further show the effects of war on societal men. In Uncle Peter’s case however, it led to his destruction and the end of his life. It was his major source of oppression as he now had to live in the lowest of the lowest, the Barns. Unlike Trimingham who’s still fully idolised and view even much more after the war, we can’t say the identical about Uncle Peter.Indeed he was idolised and his iconic status still remains with auntie Dee, as Stephen tells us the untidiness of their house ‘glowed with a kind of sacred light, like a backer and his at tributes in a religious painting’. This image is a different man from the man in the barns who is now ‘that low in the table of human precedence’. This painting is nothing close to that of war hero. As the storyteller unveils the mystery we find out he has betrayed his country, deserted his duties under the claim ‘you’re up there in the iniquity five hundred miles away from dwelling and suddenly the darkness is in you as well’.The man at the Barns and Uncle Peter are two different beings. integrity is a desperate, sick broken, deserted soul and the other whose eagle on his hat ‘spreading its gilt wings protectively’ over the children of the Close. Should Uncle Peter have essay to rejoin the society, he would have brought shame and disgrace upon his family as Uncle Peters iconic status was what reflected on Auntie Dee as even their untidy house ‘glowed with a kind of scared light, like a saint and his attributes in a re ligious painting. He is oppressed by the war effects and love as Trimingham and Ted.In his own case, he has married the wrong sister and at the same time gone from being a hero, to a man ‘that low in the table of human precedence’. He has nothing to offer the charr he loves like Ted who has nothing to offer Marian other than love. He has but a map with the one intelligence information ‘Forever’. He lives with images of the war fully fresh in his head face ‘you cant think, you cant move, Everythings drowned by this great scream of scare in the darkness as he struggles to close his mind to the memory by use second person, refusing to acknowledge them as his own experience.Like Leo is traumatised by the death of Ted, as he claims ‘the tidings of Ted’s suicide came to me voicelessly’, and ‘haunted me’, Uncle Peter lives with the trauma of the war and describes it as ‘blood-red velvet in the crown above the eagle ’. He describes his plight and says it ‘gets a bit leak, lying here and likens himself to a ‘dicky railway locomotive’. Uncle Peter deeply oppressed by the war, explains his plight to Stephen verbalize ‘you start playing some game, and you’re the brave one, you’re the great hero,‘But the games goes on and on, and it gets more and frightening’ and unfortunately for Uncle Peter the end result is death.His death remains ambiguous as we can’t find oneself if he killed himself like Ted, or if he was killed or perhaps had an accident. Marian Maudsley a beautiful ‘godess from Brandham hall an upper shopping centre classed family in late-Victorian England with her ‘hair bright with sunshine and ‘ grisly rose-pink face. She has so many social expectations from both her family and the society. Best of all shes expected to make a ‘good marriage. It was like she was ‘the climax, the let out to t he whole pattern. She was in the middle of a cross battle with her emotions.Torn between the man she ‘must marry to give her and her family the aristocracy they proclivity and the man who she shared a ‘ beautiful thing and believed ‘were made for each other. Marian was high-risk like her mother as they were ‘like two steel threads intersection each other, but ‘her face reflected all the misery she had been going through. She was oppressed by her social class and expectations, her Love for Ted and like her mother, shes expected to be a good hostess, moral, and keep her emotions and family under control by marrying Trimingham.However, Marian is a very shoddy character as she lies to her mother on her seeing someone in Norwich as she hurriedly said ‘Not a cat; we were hard at it all the time. She also thinks she can marry Trimingham and carry on with her affair with Ted. Being the ‘virgin of the zodiac, associated with the ‘Attropa Be lladonna. She was a beautiful creature yet poisonous. So was the Attropa Belladonna as social lion says ‘ I knew that every part of it was poisonous, but I knew that it was beautiful. Marian was a evil and heartless character to an extent.She was a ‘snob as Leo towards Trimingham on several occasions. She knew fully well there was no future for her and Ted and is fully aware she must marry Trimingham. She says to Leo ‘I bank building when Leo asks her why she cant marry Ted and admits to him that She ‘must marry Trimingham. Shes a selfish character, as Ted has scarified all he has for her, he rents his farm from Trimingham and knows he can loose it and is willing to take that risk. She however, takes no serios risk as she has her eyes set on aristocracy.She lures him into deceit which leaves the young man dead and she ends up as ‘Lady Trimingham. She uses Leo as ‘the Go-Between between her and Ted and still calls the young boy names like Ã¢â‚¬Ë œshylock, she tells her brother Marcus that green is a competent color for Leo. She takes advantage of the love Trimingham has for her as she threatens that she ‘wont marry him if Ted goes and is willing to go as far as saying that ‘Blackmails a game two can play at. Marian sees Teds suicide as creakyness and tells Leo ‘Ted is as weak as water.Marian is sometimes nice to Leo, ut however, all her niceness towards him always had a motive behind it. She takes him to Norwich so she can get the chance to see Ted, she buys him a bicycle to make the content obstetrical delivery faster between her and Ted. However, it could be argued that it was all out of frustration. Her eyes showed that ‘she couldnt trust herself to speak, and had ‘a hard bed to lay on. Marian Maudsley was ‘the climax of the whole story. She was responsible for Teds death and the calamity that befell Leo. She was still selfish even at old age not to admit to her faults.She proceed to live in her self-deception and in some way made herself believe she was still a popular important figure in the hall telling Leo ‘People come in shoals; I virtually have to turn them from the door; Everyone knows about me. Her grandson is left to suffer the consequences of her actions. Michael Frayn uses imagery, metaphor, and irony to present Mrs. Hayward in different ways. Through these techniques, Frayn dramatically and beautifully contrasts Mrs. Haywards calm, composed manner at the start of the novel with her serious, emotionally distraught side. Mrs.Hayward who is introduced with the six letters ‘My mother is a German Spy, a character of ‘grace and serenity always cheerful. Shes presented as an elegant and respectable character like Mrs. Maudsley and Marian who are under pressure but cant show it. She was almost a perfect being to the extent that even her chickens ‘lived blamelessly elegant lives, parading haughtily about a spacious kingdom. Howev er, Mrs. Hayward was oppressed by her social expectations to always keep a high chin and her house in order and It becomes part of her ‘to conceal her true nature . Also by her husband Mr.Hayward whose character is a bully inflicting pain on his wife that even ‘in the heat of summer she still wears a ‘cravat pinned high around her neck. It can be argued she did this to hide the bruises inflicted on her by her violent husband Mrs. Hayward cant leave her marriage because once she got married to mr. Hayward, being in that period, all her rights , properties and even her identity ceased to exist. By police she was under the complete and original supervision of her husband. Mr. Hayward carefully watches is wife and this is why she has to send Stephen to carry a message to Uncle Peter.A woman was ‘Barred by law and custom from entering trades and professions by which they could supporting themselves, and restricted in the possession of property, woman had only one means of livelihood, that of marriage. She keeps a diary with ‘Xs and ‘! ‘s representing her period and sex life. We know she has a distant relationship with her husband, and seems vaguely scared of him, so who shes having sex with is untold. posterior on, we see she has ‘Uncle Peter in her bosom perhaps the ‘Xs indicated his reciprocated love. Like Marian, she cant be with the man she loves.\r\n'